newlogo.jpg
June 24, 2003
Letters Home

Back before the end of "major combat operations" in Iraq, when I was still hanging out at The Daily Kos, I posted a few letters from someone I dubbed "Officer X."

Officer X is a military scholar of some distinction, known particularly for his studies of command and leadership in the modern Army. Although still on active duty, he was not involved in waging Gulf War II. He did, however, share his thoughts on the conduct of the war with a small group of like-minded officers, Pentagon analysts and journalists -- one of whom passed his comments along to me.

After the fall of Baghdad, Officer X went dark for awhile, but he recently resurfaced, to comment on a wire story he'd seen about the rotation of officers in the Iraq. First the story:

With heavy hearts, officers rotate
away from their combat commands

HABANIYAH, Iraq — Capt. Chris Carter stood on an Iraqi soccer field as the sun peaked over the horizon Friday morning and prepared himself to hand over command of the infantry company he led into combat . . .

. . . A dozen senior officers and colleagues looked on from bleachers during a ceremony in which the company flag was handed to the new commander, Capt. Mark Miller . . . .

Carter’s ceremony with Attack Company has been repeated dozens of times across Iraq in recent weeks as the 3rd Infantry Division rotates its officers. Within the division’s 2nd Brigade, almost every commanding officer at every level will have been replaced by the end of the month.

Summer is normally change-of-command season — allowing officers with families to move on to their next assignment without disrupting their children’s school year. But with the 3rd Infantry still in Iraq, the changes have been especially difficult for the officers and men who fought together and desperately wanted to return home together.

And Officer X's comment:

Imagine what the soldiers really feel as they see the officer flying back home; while they are standing there in 100 degree Iraq heat with possible (enemy) contact?

We have not learned anything from Vietnam.

I am not saying it is Carter's fault -- (it is) the Army's obsession with career progression rather than adapting to changing environments. But, it is more important in this Army to sustain career progression, than combat effectiveness and cohesion!

Now here I need to insert my usual disclaimer about not being in any conceivable sense of the word a military expert. But I've heard it said, and not just by Officer X, that the disintegration of the American Army in the last years of the Vietnam War was aggravated, if not caused, by the frequent rotation of both men and officers, which tended to destroy unit cohesion and morale.

Since most field armies are held together by junior officers and senior non-coms, the nonstop shuttling of lieutenants and captains into and out of line commands -- the "ticket punching" that qualified them for promotion and staff assignments -- was especially harmful. Or so I've heard it said.

And yet it seems this was not one of the lessons learned during the Army's legendary post-Vietnam soul-searching.

Nor, to judge from some of the letters being sent home, has the Army weaned itself away from the kind of behavior historian Stephen Ambrose often mentioned in his books about World War II -- the tendency of higher-ranking officers, particularly higher-ranking staff officers, to appropriate the good things of life for themselves, while staying as far away as possible from the filth and misery of the front line.

Call it the Enron style of warfare.

Some samples of these letters have been collected by ex-warrior (and relentless self-promoter) Col. David Hackworth, and posted on the web site Soldiers for the Truth. Some excerpts:

From "Senior NCO" in 3rd Infantry Division, dated June 19:

It is absolutely true that the logistical portion of the campaign was the biggest downfall both in planning and execution. The biggest travesty is, while there was an obvious miscalculation of what it would take to support us on the battlefield, there was little to no evident planning for sustaining the soldiers upon completion of the main war effort . . .

The supply lines have yet to come into fruition and simplicities such as bottled water have yet to make their appearance on a consistent basis. We have had no potable ice since our arrival. I have personally been forced to buy ice from the Iraqis so that my soldiers were not drinking hot water day in and day out.

. . . you can bet your next paycheck that anyone who is of any rank that allows them to work on a brigade or higher level staff position hasn't had to drink warm sanitized water lately.

As a matter of fact, I have witnessed several "higher ups" in my particular unit with private shower facilities, private porta-johns, and ice chests full of bottled water and potable ice in their immediate work areas while their subordinates (meaning the soldiers) are struggling every day to get a cold bottle of water.

These very same senior soldiers are living in an air conditioned room while their soldiers are trying, in vain, to keep mosquitoes from consuming them nightly, and using hoses from an Iraqi latrine stall to get water enough to maintain their hygienic needs.

From "Infantry Captain", dated June 11:

I believe that the Army logistics system here was broken from the start. We have been here for 40 days and haven't received a single part to fix broken vehicles . . . The Army supply system has given us MREs and water, but nothing else . . .

Our [divisional] HQ occupied a palace complex in Tikrit complete with swimming pool, man-made lake and 8 different palaces with air conditioning for all the soldiers. All the units located with the DIV HQ have posted operating hours! The finance unit doesn't even work on Sundays!

I have a hard time understanding why our senior ranking officers are not taking care of all the units and are so focused on taking care of themselves. I'm just not impressed. The [commanding general] came to see us once for 15 minutes and never came back . . .

My overall impression is that the [colonels] and above only care about themselves and making sure that they are living well. I believe that they think if they are living well, then everyone else is living well, because they never leave their cushy palaces to see the real fighters and killers.

From "Pissed Off Army Officer":

While the Army did a great in winning the war, what is not being covered is how broke the Army logistics system is and the damage it is doing to the long term readiness and moral of the Army . . .

Units all over the Army came to Iraq without basic things necessary for life support in the field. I am talking about portable shitters with cans that you can burn. You can't live somewhere and have everyone shitting in cat holes for weeks at time.

Units came here without tents. The 855th MP Company, a guard company from Arizona was allowed to mobilize without any tents. They lived on the ground in the most God awful piece desert you have ever seen for over two weeks.

Units came here without proper heaters for the water in their MKTs, so that when they started serving T rats, they didn't cook them enough and didn't clean the serving trays properly and everyone who ate from there got sick. If it's not a life or limb issue, its nearly impossible to get medical care . . .

Division staff sits around in their air conditioned vans watching satellite AFN goofing off on the internet and just don't give a shit about anyone else . Meanwhile, soldiers are living in the dirt, with no mail, no phone, no contact with home, and no break from the daily monotony at all.

I went to a division rear in May and practically got in a fist fight with this Captain up there over letting my private, who hadn't contacted home since we left the U.S., send an e-mail over his office's internet. This clown spends his days sending flowers to his wife and surfing the net and he won't let my private send an e-mail to her husband. Fucking disgraceful and all too typical of today's army.

Granted, bitching about such things has always been a soldier's lot -- and probably always will. But the bitching out of Iraq is taking on the particular venomous tone of an army that doesn't know why it is doing what it is doing, and is beginning to believe the guys in charge don't know what they're doing, either. Here's how "Senior NCO" sees it:

When does it end? Do we continue to keep the liberators of Iraq here so they can continue to lose soldiers periodically to snipers and ambushes? My unit has been here since September and they have no light at the end of the tunnel. How many of my soldiers need to die before they realize that we have hit a wall? We are ordered to stay and ordered to continue the mission, but at what cost? Doesn't the soldier count for anything?

To be fair, not everyone is as unhappy as Senior NCO.

From a U.S. Army Major, the deputy division engineer of the 4th Infantry Division:

The news you watch on TV is exaggerated, sensationalized and selective. Good news doesn't sell.

And how is the Major himself doing?

I'm living in a "guest palace" on a 500-acre palace compound with 20 palaces with like facilities built in half a dozen towns all over Iraq that were built for one man.

War may be hell -- but more so for some than for others.

Or, to quote "Infantry Captain:"

I continue to believe that once an officer makes the rank of Major, he receives a frontal lobotomy courtesy of the Army.

Does any of this matter? I don't mean from the viewpoint of the troops; we know what they think -- but from the perspective of our imperial war planners. Why should they give a damn if the grunts are miserable? The guerrilla war may be annoying, and deadly, but it is also, the brass tells us, militarily insignificant. And these are military professionals, not draftees. They volunteered to live in filth. So the risk of a Vietnam-style collapse would seem to be minimal.

Ah, but a volunteer army can vote with its feet. These guys may be pros, but how much more can they be expected to take? Maybe not enough to sustain the neocons' grand imperial design for the Middle East. "Pissed Off Army Officer" offers this warning:

I can tell you right now, a lot of good people are going to get the hell out over this deployment. The good soldiers won't put up with this crap. They will get out and get good jobs on the outside. We are breaking the Army and the reserve corps with this deployment needlessly.

Could that be a draft I feel coming on?

Posted by billmon at June 24, 2003 11:44 AM
Comments

Glad to see others are reading SFTT. If you've been ambivalent about what it's like to be in the military, you can pick up some idea of what it's like there. Hackworth's an interesting character, but your assessment is dead-on - a relentless self-promoter. He lost me when he took a giant dump on Mike Durant, the captured helicopter pilot in Somalia.

Now with this talk of a FIVE YEAR occupation, things are only going to get worse for these folks.

I presented a scholarship from an organization on whose board I serve to a student at my local high school at this year's awards ceremony. In the ceremony, there was a Marine recruiter there for the same purpose. He made a comment in his presentation which turned my blood cold, but which received hoots and applause from much of the crowd. He said of the five students to whom he was giving awards that these young men would be seen on CNN in the future. Now, goddammit, his words are prophetic, and we know just where they will be.

Posted by: Steve Jones at June 24, 2003 01:26 PM

"Could that be a draft I feel coming on?"

Which is what I've feared for a while. The one who should really fear the draft, though, is ol' Bush himself. Americans from the civil war on have rarely (if ever) taken kindly to conscription, and the return of the draft will be the end of Bush's political career.

Posted by: JKC at June 24, 2003 01:29 PM

When the higher-ups have heads up their asses, not knowing what the grunt knows, feels and experiences, shit happens. As for draft, Go North. The fascists in Bush administration don't give a shit if you die.

Posted by: Ville at June 24, 2003 02:35 PM

If the logistic system is so screwed, as reported, the Army will not be able to rotate units. The 3rd ID can’t drive their broken down Abrams and Bradley’s to Kuwait to board the boats. If there are only two divisions in reserve, they have to remain where they are ready to go to North Korea or whatever. I suppose you could pull a battalion out of country for rebuilding and rotate back in. But they will not appreciate taking over someone’s hell hole the second, third, fourth, or fifth go around. More likely since the Iraq War will be low grade hit and run ambushes they will keep the same units in country for pacification. In six months all the officers will have moved stateside or rear echelon jobs. In 9 months the NCO’s will have pulled their rank and followed the officers. In a year all that will be left of the original deployment will the psychotic grunts who love the danger and power. All the others will have gotten ill [PTSD or Desert Rot], wounded, or killed. By five years, Deja Vu, it will be 1 year individual rotations all over again.

Posted by: Jim S at June 24, 2003 02:45 PM

Waist deep in the Big Sandy, and the old fool says 'Move on'...

Poor Pete Seeger must be wondering what it is when you've seen it before, before, before.

Deja deja deja vu?

Posted by: Davis X. Machina at June 24, 2003 03:07 PM

"It's like deja vu all over again."

Yogi Barra

Posted by: Billmon at June 24, 2003 03:14 PM

Here are where US units are deployed:
Iraq/Kuwait:1st Armored Division (3 Brigades)
3rd Mech Infantry Division (3 Brigades)
4th Mech Infantry Division (3 Brigades)
101st Airborne (3 Brigades)
1st Infantry Division (1 Brigade)
2cd Armored Cav Regigment (light)
3rd Armored Cav Regiment (heavy)
172cd Airborne Brigade
1st Marine Division (1 Regiment)

Afganistan: 82cd Airborne Division (1 Brigade)
10th Mountain Division (elements of 1 Brigade)

Korea: 2cd Infantry Division
Japan: 3rd Marine Division (1 Regiment)
Bosnia/Kosovo: 1st Infantry Division (1 Brigade)

in the United States or otherwise uncommitted:
1st Calvary Division (3 Brigades)
82cd Airborne Division (1 Brigade)
10th Mountain Division (1 Brigade)
25th Infantry Division (2 or 3 Brigades)
225th (IIRC) Infantry Brigade (Seperate)

2cd Marine Division (2 regiments plus 1 returning from Iraq)
1st Marine Division (0 ready, plus 2 returning from Iraq)

And that is it for active duty regular forces, and the cupboard is even more barren than it appears as the 1st Calvary Division and the 25th Infantry are committed to reinforcing Korea if the balloon goes up there. The 82cd Airborne is extended beyond belief right now and it needs at least one brigade in the United States to reconstitute and relieve the forces currently in Afganistan; as does the 10th Mountain. So the only free units that the US has at the moment is an infantry brigade based in Alaska, and two Marine infantry regiments based in North Carolina plus the National Guard.

So unless peace spontaneously breaks out in the next couple of months, the only source of relief for the forces currently in Iraq are either foreign troops or US National Guard combat formations. However, I have not heard of any large scale (division sized +) call-ups of the Guard in the past two months. There is not much time left for a Guard formation to be called up, organized, trained up to speed, and shipped to Kuwait in time to get any significant force of regular duty troops back to garrison in time for Thanksgiving. So if morale right now appears to be cracking in the 3ID, it will only get worse by November as the lead units will have been there for a year with no end in sight.

Fester

Posted by: Fester at June 24, 2003 04:51 PM

I was reading through my previous post, and I have a brigade of the 82cd Airborne missing, but I am not sure where. So there might be an extra brigade available for relief and reinforcement. I also have a brigade of the 1st Mech Infantry missing (I think it is in Iraq. GlobalSecurity.org is crashing on me right now)

Sorry about these mistakes.

Fester

Posted by: Fester at June 24, 2003 04:57 PM

I think part of that missing 1st Infantry Brigade is in Iraq, and the rest is in Germany.

Likewise, I think the missing 82nd Airborne brigade is still in Iraq.

Then there's this "Stryker" brigade the Pentagon is so proud of. I don't know where it is now, but I recall reading it was heading for Korea.

Supposedly, Bremer asked Rummy to keep the 3rd ID on in Iraq after September, but he refused -- too big a headache, politically, I guess. 1st Marine is also due to come out at the end of the summer, I think.

Which means 4th Infantry, 1st Armored and the 101st could have a pretty miserable winter after they get through this miserable summer . . .

So what happens if Blair cracks (or is ousted) and the Brits pull out? Or if our Polish-led Warsaw Pact retreads get the willies?

Last I checked, Rummy and Co. were talking to Fiji, Bangladesh(!) and Nepal about sending troops.

Bangladesh: Will fight for food.

Posted by: Billmon at June 24, 2003 05:21 PM

NPR was reporting early in the AM that the US was likely to have to pick up the entire cost of supplying occupation troops for several countries. The first thing I thought of was King George the Third contracting with the German princes for their troops.

Considering that Bush is cutting taxes, just where are the necessary dollars going to come from? If I were leader of any of the cited countries, I'd wait for the check to clear before I sent any of my troops to what might be a long-term commitment to hell on earth.

Posted by: pessimist at June 24, 2003 06:42 PM

After reading this article and the comments, I happened to skip on over to the Department of defense web site to check for any recent casualties. And, lo and behold ... what should I spy ... but this:

DoD Launches Advertising Campaign to Reconnect Americans to the Military

"Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness David S.C. Chu today announced the launch of a new advertising campaign designed to strengthen the personal bond between adult Americans and their military. The campaign links the values learned through military service to success in life. The overarching goal of the initiative is to encourage adults to be more inclined to advocate military service to the young people in their lives."

I'd say they picked a hell of a day to launch an advertising campaign to encourage adults to encourage kids to sign up for jobs as cannon fodder.

Posted by: Pat K., California at June 25, 2003 12:04 AM

Your missing brigade of the 82nd is in Iraq. My brother is a Lt. with them. They have no idea when they are returning yet.

Posted by: Jeff at June 27, 2003 08:36 AM